<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Dave Delaney : Dave Made That - Latest Comments in Your Baby is on Flickr</title><link>http://davemadethat.disqus.com/</link><description>Join Dave Delaney as he blogs about social media, marketing, technology trends, and his digital life.</description><atom:link href="https://davemadethat.disqus.com/your_baby_is_on_flickr/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:23:34 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Your Baby is on Flickr</title><link>http://www.davemadethat.com/2009/03/26/your-baby-is-on-flickr/#comment-8233062</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So true! Thank you for the tips. I stopped tagging my photos after I saw all this go down.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I was unaware of using the Statistics to see if my photos are being used elsewhere.  I have fortunately been approached and asked to use some photos and I am thankful for that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But, I have been uploading my pictures to Snapfish and I only share with my family who I know will only share with family members.  But then again I know those pictures can be shared too. The real gems I don't share!!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Dave! xoxo&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TheJennTafur </dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:23:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Your Baby is on Flickr</title><link>http://www.davemadethat.com/2009/03/26/your-baby-is-on-flickr/#comment-8227555</link><description>&lt;p&gt;True. I still think sharing some photos of your children is fine, however be&lt;br&gt;careful how you tag them. Don't ever use "children" or "kids" as a tag,&lt;br&gt;perverts subscribe to searches like that.&lt;br&gt;You can also go into Flickr and look at your Statistics to see if your&lt;br&gt;photos are being used elsewhere.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cheers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Delaney</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:48:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Your Baby is on Flickr</title><link>http://www.davemadethat.com/2009/03/26/your-baby-is-on-flickr/#comment-8225979</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately I know that anything I put on flickr or on any web sharing (photo) website is going to be taken by someone. I stopped using my flickr account after reading all these reports of individuals sharing with me how their pictures were being taken without their permission although they had indicated All Rights Reserved with the Copyright Symbol.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you don't want your pictures taken then be like Patrick which is not to share pictures of certain things or people. I've taken this route.  I've been seeing a lot of pictures of kids on flickr to the point that someone had created a flickr group of children's pictures they found on flickr. I only found this out when I had shared a picture of a family friend and I quickly took my picture out of flickr not thinking that someone would do this.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is why I won't upload pictures of kids or people I don't know. I take more pictures of objects than people. You have to be careful nowadays.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for sharing..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TheJennTafur </dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:44:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Your Baby is on Flickr</title><link>http://www.davemadethat.com/2009/03/26/your-baby-is-on-flickr/#comment-7597332</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It'll be interesting to see where Yahoo! goes. They are making big  &lt;br&gt;moves in mobile, which is wise.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Delaney</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:14:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Your Baby is on Flickr</title><link>http://www.davemadethat.com/2009/03/26/your-baby-is-on-flickr/#comment-7596054</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They are owned by Yahoo! after all. Even though their CEO is kickin' butt, I still don't see them being as big of a player going forward.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nicholasyoung</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 07:20:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Your Baby is on Flickr</title><link>http://www.davemadethat.com/2009/03/26/your-baby-is-on-flickr/#comment-7582926</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great point C.C. I would love to see that too. It's too much trouble to go&lt;br&gt;into statistics to see if your photos are being used. You would think Flickr&lt;br&gt;could implement RSS, eh?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Delaney</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 09:19:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Your Baby is on Flickr</title><link>http://www.davemadethat.com/2009/03/26/your-baby-is-on-flickr/#comment-7582341</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I take the same approach you do when it comes to this for the EXACT reason you raised.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've talked about this before, but I don't understand why Flickr has not integrated a trackback ping similar to all blog platforms so that when a photos is embedded it would let you know. Sure, you wouldn't know when people download an image,but it would at least help with some of the notifications and I would LOVE to know if people use one of my CC licensed images, but it would also wake some people up to them needing to change their licenses.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">C.C. Chapman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 07:58:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Your Baby is on Flickr</title><link>http://www.davemadethat.com/2009/03/26/your-baby-is-on-flickr/#comment-7556476</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, that's also an option too of course. Good point.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Delaney</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:43:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Your Baby is on Flickr</title><link>http://www.davemadethat.com/2009/03/26/your-baby-is-on-flickr/#comment-7549809</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I generally don't even make photos of my children public.  Nor do I even talk much about them publicly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The people who are interested in seeing them are people that I know and are connected to me through the various social networking sites that I publish photos for immediate connections only.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My reasoning is there is just too much to go wrong by being public with this information/data and at the same time there is nary a benefit.  There are all types of predators on the internet and I wouldn't want pictures of my children causing any prompting in them to attempt to seek them out.  Couple that with sharing too much information about them publicly and a would be predator could easily assimilate a story to make my children feel like they were known by me or my wife.  Creating a since of safety and familiarity with them should they be approached without my presence.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is actually a big concern I have for all the "mommy blogs" out there where parents openly share a TON of information about there family publicly when wee ones are involved.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Maybe I am overly paranoid, but I rather be faulted for that, than to have something happen to them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patrick Altman</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:36:27 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>